Re: Inserting "null" not working (Sun App Server, Postgres, EJB3)?
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inserting "null" not working (Sun App Server, Postgres, EJB3)? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | C7866AAD-CAC8-4CFA-B97C-C46E9B76E2B9@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Inserting "null" not working (Sun App Server, Postgres, EJB3)? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Inserting "null" not working (Sun App Server, Postgres, EJB3)?
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On 1-Mar-07, at 7:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes: >> On 1-Mar-07, at 7:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> At least in this particular case, leaving the parameter type as >>> UNKNOWN >>> would have worked as the OP wishes. I dunno if that would break >>> other >>> cases though. > >> This means you have to leave all parameter types as UNKNOWN. What's >> the point of having parameter types at all ? > > No, only the ones you do not have any knowledge about. The OP's > complaint is basically that the driver is forcing the parameter type > to "varchar" on the basis of nothing whatsoever. > OK, this makes some sense, If they do setObject(n, null) then we bind the type to UNKNOWN. If they do setInt(n, null) we can actually get that one right. Dave > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: