Re: SATA RAID: Promise vs. 3ware
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SATA RAID: Promise vs. 3ware |
Дата | |
Msg-id | C6F49546-BD51-46EF-8A65-BFE60567CA3E@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SATA RAID: Promise vs. 3ware (Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta@wp.pl>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 20-Mar-07, at 9:23 AM, Ireneusz Pluta wrote: > Hello all, > > I sent a similar post to a FreeBSD group, but thought I'd might try > here too. > > I am completing a box for PostgreSQL server on FreeBSD. Selecting a > RAID controller I decided to go with 3ware SE9650-16, following > good opinions about 3ware controllers found on FreeBSD and > PostgreSQL groups. > > However my dealer suggest me not to go with 3ware, and take Promise > SuperTrak EX16350, instead. This suggestion does not have any > technical background and it comes generally from the fact of > limited availability of 16x 3ware controllers on the local market > and immediate availability of Promise. > > Is this technically a good idea to take Promise instead of 3ware or > rather I definitely should insist on 3ware and wait for it? > The reality is that most dealers have no idea what is "good" for a database application. It is likely that this card is better for him somehow ( more margin, easier to get, etc.) I'd stick with 3ware, areca, or lsi. And even then I'd check it when I got it to make sure it lived up to it's reputation. Dave > Thank you > > Ireneusz Pluta > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at > > http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: