Re: pg_dumpall Sets Roll default_tablespace Before Creating Tablespaces
От | Florian Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dumpall Sets Roll default_tablespace Before Creating Tablespaces |
Дата | |
Msg-id | C6935BB3-05C2-471A-BC79-1859C773C183@phlo.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dumpall Sets Roll default_tablespace Before Creating Tablespaces (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dumpall Sets Roll default_tablespace Before Creating Tablespaces
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Oct20, 2011, at 01:19 , Tom Lane wrote: > Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> writes: >> Taking this even further, why do we bother with non-immutable (i.e., >> depending on the database's contents) checks during ALTER ROLE/DATABASET SET >> at all? > > Yeah, I was wondering about that one too. It would not solve all the > problems here, but skipping validity checks would fix some of them. > The trouble of course is what happens if the value is found to be bad > when you try to use it ... Presumably we'd detect that during logon, because the GUC assignment hook will quite probably complain. I'd vote for emitting a warning in that case. This is also what we due currently if we fail to set the GUC to the desired value due to permission issues postgres=# create role r1 login; CREATE ROLE postgres=# create role r2; CREATE ROLE postgres=# alter role r1 set role = r2; ALTER ROLE postgres=# \connect - r1 WARNING: permission denied to set role "r2" WARNING: permission denied to set role "r2" You are now connected to database "postgres" as user "r1". (Dunno why that WARNING appears twice) Since an ALTER DATABASE/ROLE SET doesn't prevent the user from overriding the value, ignoring invalid settings shouldn't be a security risk. best regards, Florian Pflug
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: