Re: BUG #6168: db_link may generate additional unformatted log entries in stderr
От | Marc Mamin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #6168: db_link may generate additional unformatted log entries in stderr |
Дата | |
Msg-id | C4DAC901169B624F933534A26ED7DF3103E91747@JENMAIL01.ad.intershop.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #6168: db_link may generate additional unformatted log entries in stderr ("Marc Mamin" <marc@intershop.de>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
>> I've stumbled on a few entries in my stderr log where the line prefix wh= ere >> missing. e.g.: >> >> 2011-08-08 13:12:16 CEST|4e3fc490.17bc|6076|foo|DETAIL: Returned type >> character ... >> 2011-08-08 13:12:16 CEST|4e3fc490.17bc|6076|foo|CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL >> function "bm_ ... >> 2011-08-08 13:12:16 CEST|4e3fc490.17bc|6076|foo|STATEMENT: Select >> coalesce(colu ... >> =3D> NOTICE: table "sessions_summary_raw_20110815" does not exist, skip= ping >> =3D> NOTICE: ALTER TABLE / ADD PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index >> "pk_sessions_s ... >> =3D> NOTICE: table "sessions_site_summary_raw_20110815" does not exist, >> skipping >> >> NOTICE entries should moreover not be logged ! >> >> Those entries are coming from db_link. >> >I guess your test case is looping back to the same Postgres instance? Yes, I use db_link to trigger multithreading :) >But frankly this is an enhancement request, not a bug. The entire point >of the stderr logging mechanism is to capture random printouts to stderr >that might happen in code called by the backend, and it's doing exactly >what it's supposed to. Thanks for the explanation, this issue has no impact on our application. best regards, Marc Mamin
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: