Re: Can't build postgresql-jdbc-8.2-505 on Fedora 7
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Can't build postgresql-jdbc-8.2-505 on Fedora 7 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | C46916A5-3311-47E4-BED7-55CC9369137C@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Can't build postgresql-jdbc-8.2-505 on Fedora 7 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Can't build postgresql-jdbc-8.2-505 on Fedora 7
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Tom, On 23-Apr-07, at 6:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > So I tried to import 8.2-505 into Red Hat's development tip, and it > blew > up on me with errors that look like Java version incompatibilities, > for instance > > [javac] 53. ERROR in /builddir/build/BUILD/postgresql- > jdbc-8.2.505/org/postgresql/jdbc3g/Jdbc3gArray.java (at line 17) > [javac] public class Jdbc3gArray extends > org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2Array implements java.sql.Array > [javac] ^^^^^^^^^^^ > [javac] The type Jdbc3gArray must implement the inherited > abstract method Array.getArray(long, int, Map) > [javac] ---------- > > [javac] 57. ERROR in /builddir/build/BUILD/postgresql- > jdbc-8.2.505/org/postgresql/jdbc3g/Jdbc3gArray.java (at line 24) > [javac] public Object getArray(Map < String, Class < ? >> map) > throws SQLException > [javac] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > [javac] Syntax error, parameterized types are only available if > source level is 5.0 > [javac] ---------- This is a problem with the source level of the output. If 1.4.2 can build it, then java 1.5.0 certainly should be able to. > The identical SRPM builds fine on my Fedora Core 6 workstation, > although > I notice it says > > [echo] Configured build for the JDBC3 edition driver with SSL > > where the failed build has > > [echo] Configured build for the JDBC3g edition driver with SSL > > FC6 has java-1.4.2 where 7 has java-1.5.0. > > Not being much of a Java guru, I could use some help fixing this. > As a short-term measure, I'd be happy to de-rate the thing to plain > JDBC3, but am not sure where to poke to make that happen. In the > longer > term, what needs to be fixed to make it compatible? Should I be > filing > a bug against gcj, or is this a driver portability problem? Oh, your using gcj ??? Any chance I can get a login ? > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: