Re: Small change needed to support Greenplum DB
От | Luke Lonergan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Small change needed to support Greenplum DB |
Дата | |
Msg-id | C3E62232E3BCF24CBA20D72BFDCB6BF8044A22E8@MI8NYCMAIL08.Mi8.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgadmin-support |
<p><font size="2">Thanks Dave - much appreciated, pgadmin is a great product.<br /><br /> - Luke<br /><br /> Msg is shrtcuz m on ma treo<br /><br /> -----Original Message-----<br /> From: Dave Page [<a href="mailto:dpage@postgresql.org">mailto:dpage@postgresql.org</a>]<br/> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 11:41 AM EasternStandard Time<br /> To: Luke Lonergan<br /> Cc: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org<br /> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support]Small change needed to support Greenplum DB<br /><br /> Thanks Luke - fix committed for 1.8 using the DISTINCTON version of the<br /> query.<br /><br /> Regards, Dave<br /><br /> Luke Lonergan wrote:<br /> > Yes it does!<br/> ><br /> > - Luke<br /> ><br /> > Msg is shrt cuz m on ma treo<br /> ><br /> > -----OriginalMessage-----<br /> > From: Dave Page [<a href="mailto:dpage@postgresql.org">mailto:dpage@postgresql.org</a>]<br/> > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:21 AM EasternStandard Time<br /> > To: Luke Lonergan<br /> > Cc: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org<br /> > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] Small change needed to support<br /> > Greenplum DB<br /> ><br /> > Luke Lonerganwrote:<br /> >> Hi all,<br /> >><br /> >> A customer of ours is using pgAgent with Greenplum Databaseand needs a<br /> >> change to one of the queries used by pgAgent to allow it to work with<br /> >> Greenplum.<br/> >><br /> >> Here is the conversation:<br /> >> <br /> > _<a href="http://groups.google.com/group/pgsql.bugs/browse_thread/thread/27866354fa4d7a5e/60e6e5de3c5156d4#60e6e5de3c5156d4">http://groups.google.com/group/pgsql.bugs/browse_thread/thread/27866354fa4d7a5e/60e6e5de3c5156d4#60e6e5de3c5156d4</a><br />>><br /> >> _The problem is that Greenplum does not support some correlated<br /> >> subqueries, so Joncreated a version of the query that is both faster<br /> >> and does not use a correlated subquery.<br /> >><br/> >> The requested change is from this in pgaJob.cpp:<br /> ><br /> ><br /> > Hi Luke,<br /> ><br/> > Does Greenplum support DISTINCT ON? Specifically,<br /> ><br /> > SELECT j.*, cl.*, ag.*, sub.jlgstatus<br/> > FROM pgagent.pga_job j JOIN<br /> > pgagent.pga_jobclass cl ON cl.jclid=jobjclid LEFT OUTERJOIN<br /> > pgagent.pga_jobagent ag ON ag.jagpid=jobagentid JOIN<br /> > (SELECT DISTINCT ON (jlgjobid)jlgstatus, jlgjobid<br /> > FROM pgagent.pga_joblog<br /> > ORDER BY jlgjobid, jlgid desc) subON sub.jlgjobid = j.jobid<br /> > -- + restriction +<br /> > ORDER BY jobname;<br /> ><br /> > Regards,Dave.<br /> ><br /><br /></font>
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: