Re: Does anyone use in ram postgres database?
От | John Gage |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Does anyone use in ram postgres database? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | C3C940FF-41BB-4417-9F5F-5A2B34CD4EA4@numericable.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Does anyone use in ram postgres database? (Ozz Nixon <ozznixon@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Does anyone use in ram postgres database?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
As a kind of [very?] dumb question, is this where SQLite has been used? I am just curious. On Mar 26, 2010, at 3:14 PM, Ozz Nixon wrote: > On 3/26/10 10:06 AM, Alan McKay wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Scott Marlowe<scott.marlowe@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >>> These questions always get the first question back, what are you >>> trying to accomplish? Different objectives will have different >>> answers. >>> >> We have a real-time application that processes data as it comes in. >> Doing some simple math tells us that a disk-based DB cannot possible >> perform fast enough to allow us to process the data. >> > > I have to ask the obvious question... as we develop solutions which > must process 100,000 queries a second. In those cases, we use a > combination hash table and link-lists. There are times where SQL is > not the right choice, it is great for simplifying indexing and locks > - but prior to SQL *we* had to write code guys... and it sounds like > you too need to go back to old-school programming techniques. > > O. > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: