Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.
От | Syed, Rahila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | C3C878A2070C994B9AE61077D46C3846881534FC@MAIL703.KDS.KEANE.COM обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.
Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, >Unless I am missing something, I guess you can still keep the actual code that updates counters outside the core if youadopt an approach that Simon suggests. Yes. The code to extract progress information from VACUUM and storing in shared memory can be outside core even with pg_stat_activityas a user interface. >Whatever the view (existing/new), any related counters would have a valid (non-NULL) value when read off the view iff hooksare set perhaps because you have an extension that sets them. >I guess that means any operation that "supports" progress tracking would have an extension with suitable hooks implemented. Do you mean to say , any operation/application that want progress tracking feature will dynamically load the progress checkermodule which will set the hooks for progress reporting? If yes , unless I am missing something such dynamic loading cannot happen if we use pg_stat_activity as it gets values fromshared memory. Module has to be a shared_preload_library to allocate a shared memory. So this will mean the module can be loaded only at server restart. Am I missing something? Thank you, Rahila Syed ______________________________________________________________________ Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence for the sole use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged, confidential, and proprietary data. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender by replying promptly to this email and then delete and destroy this email and any attachments without any further use, copying or forwarding.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: