Re: Ranges for well-ordered types

On Jun 11, 2006, at 14:45 , Bruno Wolff III wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:18:11 +0900,
>   Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net> wrote:
>>
>> Time (and timestamp) is a bit of a issue conceptually. The "default"
>> successor function would depend on the precision of the timestamp.
>
> And in the ideal case it doesn't exist. That is why I think a  
> closed, open
> interval is a better way to go.

How would you go about converting a closed-open representation to a  
closed-closed representation for display purposes? Or inserting data  
that is provided in closed-closed representation?

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net