Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables)
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | C2404E95-2419-4F83-86C6-58A22C055230@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables) (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog
(a.k.a fast temp tables)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On August 24, 2016 9:32:48 AM PDT, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > >On 08/24/2016 12:20 AM, Andres Freund wrote: >> On 2016-08-23 19:18:04 -0300, Claudio Freire wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Tomas Vondra >>> <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>>> Could someone please explain how the unlogged tables are supposed >to fix the >>>> catalog bloat problem, as stated in the initial patch submission? >We'd still >>>> need to insert/delete the catalog rows when creating/dropping the >temporary >>>> tables, causing the bloat. Or is there something I'm missing? >> >> Beats me. >> > >Are you puzzled just like me, or are you puzzled why I'm puzzled? Like you. I don't think this addresses the problem to a significant enough degree to care. Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: