Re: Incorrect comment in be-secure-openssl.c
От | Daniel Gustafsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Incorrect comment in be-secure-openssl.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | C1904F65-8540-4137-AA88-F540D8612CBC@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Incorrect comment in be-secure-openssl.c (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Incorrect comment in be-secure-openssl.c
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On 1 Jun 2020, at 08:06, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > The problem I have with first and second flavors is that "DH > parameters files" does not sound right. First, the grammar sounds > incorrect to me as in this case "parameters" should not be plural. I think "parameters" is the right term here, as the shared secret is determines a set of Diffie-Hellman parameters. > Second, it is only possible to load one file with ssl_dh_params_file, > and we only attempt to load this single file within initialize_dh(). Thats correct, this is a leftover from when we allowed for different DH sizes and loaded the appropriate file. This was removed in c0a15e07cd718cb6e455e683 in favor of only using 2048. > Of course it would be possible to just switch to "DH parameter file" > in the first part of the sentence, but I have just finished by > rewriting the whole thing, as the third flavor. I don't have a problem with the existing wording of the first sentence, and I don't have a problem with your suggestion either (as long as it's parameters in plural). cheers ./daniel
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: