Re: CoC [Final v2]
От | David E. Wheeler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CoC [Final v2] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | C14ACB7A-FA92-4145-969F-935F06489FC9@justatheory.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CoC [Final v2] ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CoC [Final v2]
Re: CoC [Final v2] |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Jan 24, 2016, at 2:34 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > O.k. now I am starting to see your point. For example: o_O > Pg person A is harassing person B in the Rails community. > > How do we deal with that? > > 1. If person B is not in the Pg community then it is up to the Rails community to deal with it. > > 2. If person B is in the Pg community they can request help. > > I am open to wording on #2. I tried a couple of times but had trouble not making it a larger declaration that I think itneeds to be. How do you define “in the Pg community”? Is it someone who has posted to a known forum at least once? Someone who has beento a conference? What if they have never participated in a community forum, but use PostgreSQL at work? Maybe they wouldeventually submit a bug report or ask a question. How do you gauge that? Me, I don’t think you can. If someone reports abusive behavior by a member of the Pg community, it should not matter whetheror not the person doing the reporting is a member of the community, only that the reported abuser is. Best, David
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: