RE: PG_UPGRADE FAILED FROM 9.5 to 11*
От
Jaspreet Singh
Тема
RE: PG_UPGRADE FAILED FROM 9.5 to 11*
Дата
Msg-id
BYAPR16MB27892E09EB34D54C6DF2B95CBE9B0@BYAPR16MB2789.namprd16.prod.outlook.com
Ответ на
Re: PG_UPGRADE FAILED FROM 9.5 to 11* (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
PG_UPGRADE FAILED FROM 9.5 to 11* Jaspreet Singh <jaspresingh@tesla.com>
Re: PG_UPGRADE FAILED FROM 9.5 to 11* Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: PG_UPGRADE FAILED FROM 9.5 to 11* Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
RE: PG_UPGRADE FAILED FROM 9.5 to 11* Jaspreet Singh <jaspresingh@tesla.com>
Thanks Tom I have dropped the view and upgrade successful Thanks for your quick response -Jas -----Original Message----- From: Tom Lane Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 2:16 PM To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Jaspreet Singh ; pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PG_UPGRADE FAILED FROM 9.5 to 11* Bruce Momjian writes: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 06:42:11PM +0000, Jaspreet Singh wrote: >> We are upgrading our 9.5 postgres database to 11* version and it >> failed with below error . please help . >> >> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error while PROCESSING TOC: >> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 185; 1259 1183792 >> VIEW pg_stat_activity postgres >> LINE 27: "pg_stat_activity"."waiting", > You didn't show us the command that was causing the error. I am > thinking it might be a system view or function that references a > renamed system column. Well, we can see that the problematic view is named "pg_stat_activity", but why would pg_dump have dumped a system view? I am thinking that the source database contains a duplicate (and now obsolete) copy of the pg_stat_activity view. Probably just getting rid of that would do the trick. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: David Rowley
Дата: