Re: BDR and TX obeyance
От | Edson Richter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BDR and TX obeyance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BLU436-SMTP176164B5C7ECA778F5B6F02CFF20@phx.gbl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BDR and TX obeyance (Riley Berton <rberton@appnexus.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
I think this is the nature of "async multi master"... IMHO, It would be necessary to be "sync multi master" (with two-phase commit?) to get the behavior you expect. Atenciosamente, Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter Em 04/01/2016 18:09, Riley Berton escreveu: > I have been experimenting with BDR and have a question about how BDR > interacts with transactions. > > bdrdemo=# create table thingy (id INT, value TEXT, PRIMARY KEY(id)); > CREATE TABLE > bdrdemo=# create table tx_log(id INT, msg TEXT, PRIMARY KEY(id)); > CREATE TABLE > bdrdemo=# insert into thingy (id, value) VALUES (1, 'insert from node1'); > INSERT 0 1 > > From node1: > > bdrdemo=# begin; > BEGIN > bdrdemo=# update thingy set value='update from node1' where id=1; > UPDATE 1 > bdrdemo=# insert into tx_log (id, msg) values (1, 'tx log insert from node1'); > INSERT 0 1 > bdrdemo=# commit; > COMMIT > > Simultaneously from node2: > > bdrdemo=# begin; > BEGIN > bdrdemo=# update thingy set value='update from node2' where id=1; > UPDATE 1 > bdrdemo=# insert into tx_log (id, msg) values (2, 'tx log insert from node2'); > INSERT 0 1 > bdrdemo=# commit; > COMMIT > > ... > > bdrdemo=# select * from tx_log ; > id | msg > ----+-------------------------- > 1 | tx log insert from node1 > 2 | tx log insert from node2 > (2 rows) > > bdrdemo=# select * from thingy ; > id | value > ----+------------------- > 1 | update from node2 > (1 row) > > The conflict on the "thingy" table has resulted in node2 winning based > on last_update wins default resolution. However, both inserts have > applied. My expectation is that the entire TX applies or does not > apply. This expectation is clearly wrong. > > Question is: is there a way (via a custom conflict handler) to have the > TX obeyed? I can't see a way to even implement a simple bank account > database that changes multiple tables in a single transaction without > having the data end up in an inconsistent state. Am I missing something > obvious here? > > Thanks in advance for any help. > > riley >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: