Re: Performance on Bulk Insert to Partitioned Table

Tom, I may have to rethink it, so I'm going to have about 100 Million rows per day (5 days a week) 2 Billion per month.
Mypoint on partitioning was to be able to store 6 months of data in a single machine. About 132 partitions in a total
of66 billion rows. 


----------------------------------------
> From: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
> To: charlesrg@outlook.com
> CC: ondrej.ivanic@gmail.com; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Performance on Bulk Insert to Partitioned Table
> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:39:07 -0500
>
> Charles Gomes <charlesrg@outlook.com> writes:
> > Using rules would be totally bad as I'm partitioning daily and after one year having 365 lines of IF won't be fun
tomaintain. 
>
> You should probably rethink that plan anyway. The existing support for
> partitioning is not meant to support hundreds of partitions; you're
> going to be bleeding performance in a lot of places if you insist on
> doing that.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance