Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database?
От | Edson Richter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BLU0-SMTP64973D75A470AD792CA15ECFE50@phx.gbl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database? (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Em 17/11/2013 10:00, Michael Paquier escreveu: > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Stefan Keller <sfkeller@gmail.com> wrote: >> How can Postgres be used and configured as an In-Memory Database? >> >> Does anybody know of thoughts or presentations about this "NoSQL feature" - >> beyond e.g. "Perspectives on NoSQL" from Gavin Roy at PGCon 2010)? >> >> Given, say 128 GB memory or more, and (read-mostly) data that fit's into >> this, what are the hints to optimize Postgres (postgresql.conf etc.)? > In this case as you are trading system safety (system will not be > crash-safe) for performance... The following parameters would be > suited: > - Improve performance by reducing the amount of data flushed: > fsync = off > synchronous_commit=off > - Reduce the size of WALs: > full_page_writes = off > - Disable the background writer: > bgwriter_lru_maxpages = 0 > Regards, One question: would you please expand your answer and explain how would this adversely affect async replication? Edson
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: