Re: how to allow integer overflow for calculating hash code of a string?
| От | Haifeng Liu |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: how to allow integer overflow for calculating hash code of a string? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | BLU0-SMTP13034F84D37BB33ECC7F238B9990@phx.gbl обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: how to allow integer overflow for calculating hash code of a string? (Craig James <cjames@emolecules.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: how to allow integer overflow for calculating hash code
of a string?
|
| Список | pgsql-admin |
On Sep 20, 2012, at 10:34 PM, Craig James <cjames@emolecules.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Haifeng Liu <liuhaifeng@live.com> wrote:I want to write a hash function which acts as String.hashCode() in java: hash = hash * 31 + s.charAt(i)... but I got integer out of range error. How can I avoid this? I saw java do not care overflow of int, it just make the result negative.
Use the bitwise AND operator to mask the hash value with 0x3FFFFFF before each iteration:
hash = (hash & 67108863) * 31 + s.charAt(i);
Craig
Thank you, I believe your solution is OK for a hash function, but I am aiming to create a hash function that is consistent with the one applications use. I know postgresql 9.1 has a hash function called hashtext, but I don't know what algorithm it use, and I also see that it's not recommended to relay on it. So I am trying to create a hash function which behaves exactly the same as java.lang.String.hashCode(). The later one may generate negative hash value. I guess when the number is overflowing, the part out of range will be ignored, and if the highest bit get 1, the hash value turn to negative value.
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: