RE: Popcount optimization using AVX512
От | Amonson, Paul D |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Popcount optimization using AVX512 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BL1PR11MB5304070E33F7DD0520445B77DC2D2@BL1PR11MB5304.namprd11.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Popcount optimization using AVX512 (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Popcount optimization using AVX512
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Won't I still need the runtime checks? If I compile with a compiler supporting the HW "feature" but run on HW without thatfeature, I will want to avoid faults due to illegal operations. Won't that also affect performance? Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 8:29 AM > To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> > Cc: Amonson, Paul D <paul.d.amonson@intel.com>; Andres Freund > <andres@anarazel.de>; Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>; Shankaran, > Akash <akash.shankaran@intel.com>; Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>; > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; Matthias van de Meent > <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>; pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org > Subject: Re: Popcount optimization using AVX512 > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 09:56:32AM +1300, David Rowley wrote: > > Maybe it's worth exploring something along the lines of the attached > > before doing the AVX512 stuff. It seems like a pretty good speed-up > > and will apply for CPUs without AVX512 support. > > +1 > > -- > Nathan Bossart > Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: