Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --
От | Leeuw van der, Tim |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres -- |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BF88DF69D9E2884B9BE5160DB2B97A85010D6D5F@nlshl-exch1.eu.uis.unisys.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi, I found bulk-insert to perform very slow, when compared to MySQL / Oracle. All inserts were done in 1 transaction. However,mitigating factors here were: - Application was a .Net application using ODBC drivers - PostgreSQL 7.3 running on CYGWIN with cygipc daemon - Probably very bad tuning in the config file, if any tuning done at all - The application was issuing 'generic' SQL since it was generally used with Oracle and MySQL databases. So no tricks likeusing COPY or multiple rows with 1 INSERT statement. No stored procedures either. - When doing queries, most of the time the results were comparable to or better than MySQL (the only other database thatI tested with myself). So what I can say is, that if you want fast INSERT performance from PostgreSQL then you'll probably have to do some trickerythat you wouldn't have to do with a default MySQL installation. regards, --Tim -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Markus Schaber Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 2:15 PM To: PostgreSQL Performance List Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres -- Hi, Mischa, On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 20:47:17 GMT Mischa Sandberg <ischamay.andbergsay@activestateway.com> wrote: > On the other hand, if you do warehouse-style loading (Insert, or PG > COPY, into a temp table; and then 'upsert' into the perm table), I can > guarantee 2500 inserts/sec is no problem. As we can forsee that we'll have similar insert rates to cope with in the not-so-far future, what do you mean with 'upsert'? Do you mean a stored procedure that iterates over the temp table? Generally, what is the fastest way for doing bulk processing of update-if-primary-key-matches-and-insert-otherwise operations? Thanks, Markus Schaber -- markus schaber | dipl. informatiker logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53 mailto:schabios@logi-track.com | www.logi-track.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: