Re: standard_conforming_strings

On Jul 15, 2010, at 12:30 AM, Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> wrote:
> On 14/07/10 15:48, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Josh Berkus<josh@agliodbs.com>  wrote:
>>>> An actual plan here might look like "let's flip it before 9.1alpha1
>>>> so we can get some alpha testing cycles on it" ...
>>>
>>> "Hey, let's flip it in 9.1 CF 1, so that we can have some alpha testing
>>> cycles on it."
>>
>> Should we do this?  Patch attached.
>
> Any reason not to add a line to the 9.0 docs/release notes saying "WARNING: The PGDG currently plan to change this
setting'sdefault in 9.1"? 

Well, mostly that we could change our mind if it makes too big a boom.  And it's not as if we could go back and update
everyone'sdocs after-the-fact. I agree we need some press, but the docs are not the right vehicle. 

...Robert