Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues?
От | Mikkel Høgh |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BEF0B6B6-8EAB-4082-B81C-819FA0982C0B@hoegh.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Well, in that benchmark, what you say is only true for the Niagara processors. On the Opteron page, MySQL performance only drops slightly as concurrency passes 50. MySQL might have a problem with Niagara, but it doesn't seem like it has the severe concurrency vulnerability you speak of. There are many reasons to pick PostgreSQL, but this one doesn't seem to be a general thing. In general, MySQL seems to have problems with some kinds of threading, since their perfomance on Mac OS X is crappy as well for that reason. -- Kind regards, Mikkel Høgh <mikkel@hoegh.org> On 13/10/2008, at 10.43, Greg Smith wrote: > On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, Scott Marlowe wrote: > >> It may well be that in a more realistic testing that mysql keeps up >> through 5 or 10 client connections then collapses at 40 or 50, >> while pgsql keeps climbing in performance. > > One of the best pro-PostgreSQL comparisons showing this behavior is > at http://tweakers.net/reviews/649/7 MySQL owns that benchmark until > you hit 40 users, then...ouch. > > -- > * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com > Baltimore, MD
Вложения
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: