Re: gram.y=>preproc.y

On Nov 10, 2008, at 8:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> We should probably standardize on the perl version, ugly or not,  
> because
> otherwise we'll have a difference in build process between Unix and
> Windows machines.  Personally I don't really care how ugly it is as  
> long
> as no one has to look at it ;-) ... but if someone wants to beautify  
> the
> perl script they're surely welcome to do so.

I'd be happy to, but I haven't really been following this thread. What  
does it do, and how do I make sure it continues to work as I refactor  
it?

I'm fine to wait until it's committed, too.

>
Best,

David