Re: backup.sgml patch that adds information on custom format backups
От | Ivan Lezhnjov IV |
---|---|
Тема | Re: backup.sgml patch that adds information on custom format backups |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BD8ECC33-75B3-4CC1-9C26-863F5F31FB4A@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: backup.sgml patch that adds information on custom format backups (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: backup.sgml patch that adds information on custom format backups
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello everyone! I'd like to thank you for quick replies and for the thoughtful feedback. I'm working on improving the current wording and I'm going to follow up shortly with an updated version. Please, stay tuned. Ivan On Feb 11, 2013, at 12:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> I'm not sure what others think, but the proposed wording seems a bit >> hard on plain text dumps to me. > > I wasn't terribly thrilled with labeling pg_dumpall "deprecated", > either. It might be imperfect for some use cases, but that adjective > suggests that we're trying to get rid of it, which surely isn't the > case. > > regards, tom lane > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: