Re: Polymorphic types vs. domains
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Polymorphic types vs. domains |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BBEC40FD-BCC9-4C5F-BBDC-E72E045E7390@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Polymorphic types vs. domains ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Polymorphic types vs. domains
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
How would it break any apps? They would hve to be depending on passing arrays as anynonarray? That seems unlikely. On the other hand I don't see much reason to backpatch. It's not like anyone is going to run into this problem unexpectedly on a running system. It just doesn't seem like a back patchable bug fix. -- Greg On 8 Dec 2008, at 08:00, "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> wrote: > On Dec 8, 2008, at 2:46 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Comments? > > +1 > >> If this is agreed to be a bug, should we consider >> back-patching it? (I'd vote not, I think, because the behavioral >> change could conceivably break some apps that work now.) > > +1 > > Best, > > David > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: