Re: Aberdeen Study on OS RDBMS: exceprts and breakdown.
От | Fred Moyer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Aberdeen Study on OS RDBMS: exceprts and breakdown. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BB0DBC43-83FC-11D8-B83E-000A9598018A@redhotpenguin.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Aberdeen Study on OS RDBMS: exceprts and breakdown. (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Aberdeen Study on OS RDBMS: exceprts and breakdown.
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
>> >> PostgreSQL users indicate that improvements in some areas are >> contemplated, but the next version of PostgreSQL may come as late as >> two >> years from now, and the community that drives PostgreSQL development >> is >> not committing to any particular improvements. >> >> # uh... two years out... i couldn't come up with an explanation for >> that... well, many of these features are planned for in 7.5, and I >> wonder if it is worth coming up with a "response" to the information >> above # > > As Bruce says, the 2 years thing is extremely puzzling. Especially as > they > could have just looked at the release notes to see actual dates. I think this is a case of the investigators not being in the know of where to look for the information. The release notes aren't always the first place someone who is not familiar with PostgreSQL will look. End users of Postgres are sometimes shielded from the actual setup and source code by their sysadmins. It is not that they are incapable of reading through the distribution files, they just spend their time in psql, pgadmin, and the website documentation. I find the weekly news to be a great summary of what's going on when I'm away from the lists but for those who aren't on the announce list it takes a while for them to get there. I think posting the weekly news to the website front page would be a great way to reach out to those channels.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: