Re: Windows + IP6 progress
От | Chuck McDevitt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Windows + IP6 progress |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BB05A27C22288540A3A3E8F3749B45AB01500A06@MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Windows + IP6 progress (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Windows + IP6 progress
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The definition in WS2tcpip.h WINSOCK_API_LINKAGE int WSAAPI getaddrinfo( IN const char FAR * nodename, IN const char FAR * servname, IN const struct addrinfo FAR * hints, OUTstruct addrinfo FAR * FAR * res ); (IN, FAR, and OUT are #defined to empty string). WINSOCK_API_LINKAGE is __declspec(dllimport) WSAAPI is __stdcall So, nothing magic with #defines of the name getaddrinfo. > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers- > owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 3:47 PM > To: Andrew Dunstan > Cc: PostgreSQL-development > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows + IP6 progress > > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > > . what do we do about the getaddrinfo test? I'm almost inclined not to > > do it on windows, and assume that if we have ws2_32.dll we have it. > > There's something mighty fishy about that. AC_REPLACE_FUNCS works on > Windows for the other cases it's used for (no?), so what's different > about getaddrinfo? Perhaps Microsoft has #define'd that name as > something else, or some equally ugly crock? It'd be useful to look into > their header files and see exactly how and where getaddrinfo is > declared. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: