Re: Queries 15 times slower on 8.1 beta 2 than on 8.0
От | Jean-Pierre Pelletier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Queries 15 times slower on 8.1 beta 2 than on 8.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BAYC1-PASMTP044401579071F97B30C53F95960@CEZ.ICE обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Queries 15 times slower on 8.1 beta 2 than on 8.0 ("Jean-Pierre Pelletier" <pelletier_32@sympatico.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Explain analyze on my 8.0.1 installation does report the time for slower queries but for this small query it reports 0.000 ms ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com> To: <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org> Cc: "Jean-Pierre Pelletier" <pelletier_32@sympatico.ca>; "John Arbash Meinel" <john@arbash-meinel.com> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 6:19 PM Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Queries 15 times slower on 8.1 beta 2 than on 8.0 > Jean-Pierre, > > First off, you're on Windows? > >> " -> Seq Scan on price p (cost=0.00..11317.75 rows=581475 width=4) >> (actual time=0.004..1143.720 rows=581475 loops=1)" > > Well, this is your pain point. Can we see the index scan plan on 8.1? > Given that it's *expecting* only one row, I can't understand why it's > using a seq scan ... > >> "Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.00..11.02 rows=1 width=0) (actual >> time=0.000..0.000 rows=1 loops=1)" >> " -> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.00..5.48 rows=1 width=4) (actual >> time=0.000..0.000 rows=1 loops=1)" >> "Total runtime: 0.000 ms" > > Feh, this looks like the "windows does not report times" bug, which makes > it hard to compare ... > > -- > --Josh > > Josh Berkus > Aglio Database Solutions > San Francisco > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: