Re: basic question (shared buffers vs. effective cache size)
От | Sally Sally |
---|---|
Тема | Re: basic question (shared buffers vs. effective cache size) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BAY9-F49GpC8Lpuo3Gl0001d292@hotmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | basic question (shared buffers vs. effective cache size) ("Sally Sally" <dedeb17@hotmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: basic question (shared buffers vs. effective cache
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Thanks much Scott, makes sense now. You said "Now, effective_cache_size sets nothing other than itself. I.e. it allocates nothing in memory. It is pretty much a big course setting knob that tells the planner about how much memory the kernel is using to cache its data" So how can you know how much memory the kernel is actually using to cache (Solaris)? and specifically is it something you can set/change and also watch as it is happening with some command like top (Linux shows how much is cached but I don't see that in Solaris). Thanks Sally _________________________________________________________________ Stop worrying about overloading your inbox - get MSN Hotmail Extra Storage! http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=hotmail/es2&ST=1/go/onm00200362ave/direct/01/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: