Re: Access 97 and pgsqlodbc version 7.03.0100
От | Ben Trewern |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Access 97 and pgsqlodbc version 7.03.0100 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BAY8-F86bhsKd6QR7j10002a7e5@hotmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Access 97 and pgsqlodbc version 7.03.0100 ("Ben Trewern" <ben_trewern@hotmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
The Master table Primary key is varchar(10) but the detail table has a varchar(50) as the joined field. I'll try changing it now. Regards, Ben >From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> >To: Ben Trewern <ben_trewern@hotmail.com> >CC: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org >Subject: Re: [ODBC] Access 97 and pgsqlodbc version 7.03.0100 >Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 10:58:26 +0900 > >Ben Trewern wrote: > > > > This seems to have fixed the GPF problem but now if I look at a Master - > > Detail form I get #Deleted in some of the fields in the detail subform: > > > > Field1 Field2 Descripton1 Field4 Field5 > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > 10 1/1/03 Description OK 1000.00 1.148 > > #Deleted #Deleted Description OK #Deleted #Deleted > > #Deleted #Deleted Description OK #Deleted #Deleted > > > > I'm not sure if the above will look OK on your e-mail client but it is >meant > > to show the first line OK but the following lines have #Deleted >everywhere > > except the Description1 field which is a memo. > >Do you create an unique index on the table or specify a >really unique identifier for the table ? > >regards, >Hiroshi Inoue > http://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/ > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > >http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html _________________________________________________________________ Get Hotmail on your mobile phone http://www.msn.co.uk/msnmobile
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: