Re: Vacuum (table performance)
От | Claudio Lapidus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vacuum (table performance) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BAY7-F104J8uT6Ssuot000329fa@hotmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Vacuum (table performance) ("Claudio Lapidus" <clapidus@hotmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Vacuum (table performance)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wries: > >> Does a REINDEX of the table fix it? > Yes, positively it does. After reindexing all five indices of the table, vacuum times have dropped from minutes to seconds. Looking at pg_class, it is apparent that there was a cut in the number of tuples of about 30% for all indices, but the number of pages dropped by about 90%! Other people mentioned that this probably would get fixed in a forthcoming release. Is there anything we can do in the meantime? thanks cl. _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: