Re: proposal for PL packages for 8.3.
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal for PL packages for 8.3. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BAY20-F518F0F11F59F41F3D5C38F9550@phx.gbl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: proposal for PL packages for 8.3. (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: >-- Start of PGP signed section. > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 08:38:22AM +0100, Richard Huxton wrote: > > > There are three separate issues we seem to be talking about. > > > > > > 1. Namespaces - visibility or otherwise of objects > > > 2. Procedural state - something that looks like a shared variable > > > 3. Packaging - installation/dependency handling > > > > Well, it would be nice to have some clarification about the expected > > scope and lifetimes of these variables. If two different sessions > > change the values, what's supposed to happen? > >Right, I am confused whether these are session or schema-local >variables. What does Oracle support? Looking at this: > > http://thinkoracle.blogspot.com/2005/10/oracle-packages.html > >it seems varaiable are per-session. > Oracle use packages dbms_pipe and dbms_alert for interprocess communication, not shared variables. For both packages exists emulation in orafunc on pgfoundry. regards Pavel _________________________________________________________________ Chcete sdilet sve obrazky a hudbu s prateli? http://messenger.msn.cz/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: