Re: PL/pgSQL Todo, better information in errcontext from plpgsql
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PL/pgSQL Todo, better information in errcontext from plpgsql |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | BAY114-F35DD2D00A0BC71C53D41D0F9130@phx.gbl обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PL/pgSQL Todo, better information in errcontext from plpgsql (Jim Nasby <jimn@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PL/pgSQL Todo, better information in errcontext from plpgsql
Re: PL/pgSQL Todo, better information in errcontext from plpgsql |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
>On Oct 5, 2006, at 9:30 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: >>With func oid I can get all other info later, without it, I need estimate >>which functions are in stack track. > >Why do you need the OID to know exactly what function something is? What's >wrong with schema.function(args)? >-- oid is simply unique. I can take source code, args and all without parsing. It's only one difference. I unlike parsing. I don't think so regress tests needs showing errcontext now. Regress test are in C and we can exactly set what we would show? Regards Pavel Stehule _________________________________________________________________ Emotikony a pozadi programu MSN Messenger ozivi vasi konverzaci. http://messenger.msn.cz/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: