Re: MySQL 5 comparison
От | Ned Lilly |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MySQL 5 comparison |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BAY0-SMTP024F6C7DD85F8A2D3C8CA4D6930@phx.gbl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MySQL 5 comparison ("Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: MySQL 5 comparison
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Merlin Moncure wrote: > Putting my advocacy hat on, > If you look at their description of the upcoming features, it's > saturated with words like 'basic', 'initial', and 'rudimentary'. I > don't think mysql 5.0 will be a watershed moment where it will become > the database of choice for industrial application development... That reminds me of another, related question ... can anyone comment on the relationship between MySQL 5 and MaxDB (formerlySAP DB)? The talk at one point was that the end result of that alliance would be a total rewrite of MySQL to incorporateconcepts from MaxDB, and that the new product would somehow be backward compatible with both predecessors.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: