Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTintzY6GXL-QWcAhCBMjiSmS9XS=yQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH
Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > I noticed the 9.1 release notes claim that the new > EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH thing is an environment variable, whereas it is > actually a psql variable. > > This is perhaps sort of a Freudian slip. Since the editor itself is > configured using an environment variable, shouldn't any configuration > about the editor also be an environment variable, so people can > configure them together? It's probably the result of drift between the original patch and what was eventually committed. IIRC, Pavel had it as an environment variable originally, but Tom and I didn't feel the feature was important enough to merit that treatment. > Another thought is that this whole thing could be done away with if we > just allowed people to pass through arbitrary options to the editor, > like > > \edit file.sql +50 -a -b -c > > For powerusers, this could have interesting possibilities. That's an intriguing possibility. But part of the point of the original feature was to be able to say: \ef somefunc 10 ...and end up on line 10 of somefunc, perhaps in response to an error message complaining about that line. I don't think your proposal would address that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: