Re: Out Of Memory 8.1
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Out Of Memory 8.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTintWVhB3YMXM=oZePe+=t-GXX37cA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Out Of Memory 8.1 ("French, Martin" <frenchm@cromwell.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:56 AM, French, Martin <frenchm@cromwell.co.uk> wrote: > Thanks for the info Tom. > > The table has been analyzed (somewhat repeatedly...), with the stats > target set at various limits. > > At the moment default_statistics_target = 50. > > I've had work_mem as low as 1MB and as high as 128MB, with little to no > avail. > > Setting enable_hashagg = off, does allow the query to complete, but > mashes the next query in the batch with it having to be killed at 8 > hours. Setting it off for this query alone causes the next query to do > exactly the same. > > The thing that perplexes me is; that on RHEL 5.0 with all the same > settings and data, the query works fine... so it's confusing as to what > can have changed so much to cause this. I know that we had to move to > RHEL 5.4 because of PERC Raid drivers, but I wouldn't have thought that > would've made too much of a difference. So what's the difference between the query plans on the two machines? Any difference in non-default settings in postgresql.conf between the two machines?
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: