Re: pg_dump --binary-upgrade vs. ALTER TYPE ... DROP ATTRIBUTE
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump --binary-upgrade vs. ALTER TYPE ... DROP ATTRIBUTE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTingePf-hSg-eFMUOZTk7s88LpjTLw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump --binary-upgrade vs. ALTER TYPE ... DROP ATTRIBUTE (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump --binary-upgrade vs. ALTER TYPE ... DROP ATTRIBUTE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> I've now committed this part; the actual fix for pg_dump is still >> outstanding. I am not too in love with the syntax you've chosen here, >> but since I don't have a better idea I'll wait and see if anyone else >> wants to bikeshed. > > How about "ALTER TABLE tabname [NOT] OF TYPE typename"? It's at least a > smidgeon less ambiguous. I thought of that, but I hate to make CREATE TABLE and ALTER TABLE almost-but-not-quite symmetrical. But one might well wonder why we didn't decide on: CREATE TABLE n OF TYPE t; ...rather than the actual syntax: CREATE TABLE n OF t; ...which has brevity to recommend it, but likewise isn't terribly clear. I presume someone will now refer to a standard of some kind.... -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: