Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rees
Тема Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Дата
Msg-id BANLkTinOw9WSM-pq4h-HRJO9uy9MM1SwOA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck  (Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com> wrote:
> On 4/5/11 7:07 AM, "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
>>One thing about MLC flash drives (which the industry seems to be
>>moving towards) is that you have to factor drive lifespan into the
>>total system balance of costs. Data point: had an ocz vertex 2 that
>>burned out in ~ 18 months.  In the post mortem, it was determined that
>>the drive met and exceeded its 10k write limit -- this was a busy
>>production box.
>
> What OCZ Drive?  What controller?  Indilinx? SandForce?  Wear-leveling on
> these vary quite a bit.

SandForce SF-1200

-Dave

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Scott Carey
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Следующее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck