Re: Possible oversight in org.postgresql.xa.PGXAConnection.commitPrepared(Xid xid)
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Possible oversight in org.postgresql.xa.PGXAConnection.commitPrepared(Xid xid) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTinLfz4fa1sOFjiNXapjG_zU76HeYg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Possible oversight in org.postgresql.xa.PGXAConnection.commitPrepared(Xid xid) (Justin Bertram <jbertram@redhat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Possible oversight in org.postgresql.xa.PGXAConnection.commitPrepared(Xid
xid)
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Justin Bertram <jbertram@redhat.com> wrote: > I had to adjust the patch so that the new variable xaerrcode was passed into the PGXAException constructor (on line 522of the patched code) rather than XAException.XAER_RMERR. Once that was done recovery worked just as expected. Thanksfor your work on this! Interesting. We've been looking at exactly that error as well and were just about to submit a similar, but different patch. My understanding is that if the TM requests rollback of a transaction and then the database crashes before it can reply, the TM may request rollback a second time. If the first rollback did actually remove the transaction this then replies that the transaction is unknown. So XAER_RMERR is exactly the wrong error in some cases of 42704. Thoughts? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: