Re: procpid?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: procpid? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTinLb=PfdHe9u3UBQNB3DKGEcGp3hQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: procpid? (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > +1 > > If we were going to make changes like this, I'd suggest we save them > up in a big bag for when we change major version number. Everybody in > the world thinks that PostgreSQL v8 is compatible across all versions > (8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4), and it will be same with v9. That way we > would still have forward progress, but in more sensible sized steps. > Otherwise we just break the code annually for all the people that > support us. If we had a more stable environment for tools vendors, > maybe people wouldn't need to be manually typing procpid anyway... Amen. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: