Re: pgAdmin III commit: Database Designer (milestone 1 of GSoC 2011)
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Database Designer (milestone 1 of GSoC 2011) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTinKcs=dCmST-X=2rObFO6PAMisUPQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Database Designer (milestone 1 of GSoC 2011) (Luis Ochoa <ziul1979@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgAdmin III commit: Database Designer
(milestone 1 of GSoC 2011)
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Wednesday, June 29, 2011, Luis Ochoa <ziul1979@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Luis Ochoa <ziul1979@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Well, I can change that class name, but when should I do that, now or >> later? >> which name can be used? > > Now would be better - I prefer not to leave the tree in a state where > we know major restructuring is required for too long. Name-wise, I'd > call the module "hotdraw", and prefix the class naes with "hd". > > Well, I think "hotdraw" name standalone can be a problem because this is the name of the original implementation, and thatcould lead to confuse developers who work with source the code in the future, I suggest then something hd only and theprefix will be hd too. What do you think about this? > hd works for me. >>> Well, docs will be done at the end. > > End of what? If this is a milestone commit, then it presumably (I > hope) encompasses some completed functionality - which really isn't > complete until the docs are done. With the best will in the world, > things left to the end of GSoC projects often don't get completed as > planned, and I'd rather not see us end up with another cool, but > undocumented feature. > > Well I didn't write that sentence (following the thread) or anything about writing docs at my project/proposal (or before),because I never got a petition of doing that kind of things now or before, and they aren't included at my schedule.But I can do that if someone tell me what Should I do?. > No sorry - that was directed at Guillaume. I don't want to throw your GSoC schedule into turmoil, so I'm not going to insist on docs now (though I would expect them by the end of the project), but the project has always had an unwritten rule that any new features should include the docs - we've just been lax about enforcing it. That cannot continue though - we really need to become more disciplined. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: