Re: Speeding up loops in pl/pgsql function
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Speeding up loops in pl/pgsql function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTinGoSk9=5CQVAyvgAK4i+8235REuA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Speeding up loops in pl/pgsql function ("Reuven M. Lerner" <reuven@lerner.co.il>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hello > > (1) Are there any good guidelines for what operations in pl/pgsql are > optimized for which data structures? For example, it turns out that a great > deal of time is being spent in the substring() function, which surprised me. > I thought that by switching to an array, it might be faster, but that > wasn't the case, at least in my tests. Having a sense of what I should and > shouldn't be trying, and which built-in functions are particularly fast or > slow, would be useful to know. > PL/pgSQL is perfect like glue for SQL. For all other isn't good http://okbob.blogspot.com/2010/04/frequent-mistakes-in-plpgsql-design.html http://www.pgsql.cz/index.php/PL/pgSQL_%28en%29#When_PL.2FpgSQL_is_not_applicable > > (2) Is there any configuration setting that would (perhaps) speed things up > a bit? I thought that maybe work_mem would help, but the documentation > didn't indicate this at all, and sure enough, nothing really changed when I > increased it. > > probably not Just PL/pgSQL is not C, and you cannot do some heavy string or array operations. Regards Pavel Stehule
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: