Re: Discussion - Search Objects
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Discussion - Search Objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTinBUkLoaH-9usHp5dbJfNA5JsJYFw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Discussion - Search Objects (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 20:54 +0100, Dave Page wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Guillaume Lelarge >> <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >> > On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 23:48 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote: >> >> Yeah, I know. All of the dialogs have a "binding" to some pgObject, >> >> because all of them modifies something. >> > >> > No, see dlgFindAndReplace. >> >> Yeah, back in the early days there was some confusion about what was a >> form (window) and what was a dialog - I don't want to add to that now. >> >> In pgAdmin virtually all of our dialogues are actually more like >> regular windows because they are sizeable. That's a conscious >> decision, made for reasons of usability and consistency. With that in >> mind, I consider forms to be the "main" application windows, eg. >> frmMain, frmQuery, frmDebugger, frmStatus and so on. Everything else >> is a dialogue - a popup to perform a quick task eg. vacuum, backup or >> search/replace, to adjust program options (frmOptions is one of the >> mistakes!), or to define/display properties of a database object. >> > > One of the things I want to do for 1.16 is a new options dialog. We > already discussed its design. I wonder if we should also change it to a > dlgOptions file. Is it OK for you? Absolutely :-) -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: