Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | BANLkTinBGrQwW0s_BQ32vA1z=457LMfBDw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now,
with WIP patch
Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> As long as we have solidarity of the committers that this is not allowed, however, this is not a real problem. And itappears that we do. In the future, it shouldn't even be necessary to discuss it. > > Solidarity? > > Simon - who was a committer last time I checked - seems to think that > the current process is entirely bunko. I'm not sure why anyone that disagrees with you should be accused of wanting to junk the whole process. I've not said that and I don't think this. Before you arrived, it was quite normal to suggest tuning patches after feature freeze. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: