Re: Invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8", caused due to non wide-char-aware downcase_truncate_identifier() function on WINDOWS
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8", caused due to non wide-char-aware downcase_truncate_identifier() function on WINDOWS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTimy+bQGeFqr-v5ENhi3YMK4iUDeqQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8", caused due to non wide-char-aware downcase_truncate_identifier() function on WINDOWS (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8", caused due to non wide-char-aware downcase_truncate_identifier() function on WINDOWS
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> If we need to work around brain-dead isupper() tests, maybe the best >>> thing is to implement two versions of the loop: >>> if (encoding is single byte) > >> That seems like a clear improvement. It's a long way from perfect, >> but still worthwhile. > > Hmm ... while the above is easy enough to do in the backend, where we > can look at pg_database_encoding_max_length, we have also got instances > of this coding pattern in src/port/pgstrcasecmp.c. It's a lot less > obvious how to make the test in frontend environments. Thoughts anyone? I'm not sure if this helps at all, but an awful lot of those tests are against hard-coded strings that are known to contain only ASCII characters. Is there some way we can optimize this for that case? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: