Re: [ADMIN] Missing documentation for error code: 80S01
От | Oliver Jowett |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [ADMIN] Missing documentation for error code: 80S01 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTimwwzsxhq36T4k7jNUexPEiyeVz_w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [ADMIN] Missing documentation for error code: 80S01 ("Donald Fraser" <postgres@kiwi-fraser.net>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On 13 April 2011 21:57, Donald Fraser <postgres@kiwi-fraser.net> wrote: > Technically yes. When performing a read on the socket you get -1 indicating > EOF or remote socket closed. You don't get an IO error. > The difficult part is what was the client doing when the server closes the > socket? > If the client wasn't doing anything then the next likely action a client > would perform is to execute a query which would involve writing to the > socket first and in this case you will get a broken pipe IO exception, > rather than remote socket closed. > If the client had already executed a query and was attempting to read > response data then you get remote socket closed. > > I would like to propose that when a "remote socket closed" is detected that > the JDBC driver uses a different error code to the one used for IO > exceptions. If the server is shut down mid-query, doesn't the backend complete the current query cycle before closing the connection? i.e. we'd see ErrorResponse, ReadyForQuery, and return control to the app before seeing EOF anyway? The protocol spec is a bit vague there. Oliver
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: