Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | BANLkTimwexT+XFbwOvahjd0bkcwTEQ36Qg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 16:39, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >> We discussed earlier to potentially block the creation, and removal, >> of branches on the origin server, to prevent mistakes like this. It >> has only happened once in almost a year, so it's probably not >> necessary - but I wanted to raise the option anyway in case people >> forgot about it. > >> The downside would be that in order to create or drop a branch *when >> intended* a committer would need someone from the infrastructure team >> to temporarily switch off the branch-blocking setting, and then back >> on.. > > I think it would be sensible to block branch removal, as there's > basically never a scenario where we'd do that during current usage. > I'm not excited about blocking branch addition, although I worry > sooner or later somebody will accidentally push a private development > branch :-(. Is it possible to block only removal and not addition? Yes, I think so. Either way it'll require a small addition to the scripts we're using, so I'll try to just turn it into two different settings. I don't see offhand any reason why this shouldn't work. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: