Re: branching for 9.2devel
От | David Blewett |
---|---|
Тема | Re: branching for 9.2devel |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTimpHagRHtGG8PMqVG-rEXYg4apV7w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: branching for 9.2devel (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > >>> You can't indent patches, only patched files. And that's the problem >>> with this happy scheme. For it to work at all sanely we'd need to keep >>> the committed code that the patch is to be applied against strictly >>> pgindent clean, presumably via some automated process such as a commit >>> hook. That's been suggested in the past, but hasn't met with universal >>> approval, IIRC. > > Well, there is another solution to this, which is to use Git branches > and forks instead of mailing around patches. Shouldn't it be as simple as keeping a git clone of trunk up to date, applying the patch, running pgindent and emitting the resulting diff? Once it's been generated, just run git reset --hard to clean out all local changes. -- Thanks, David Blewett
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: