Re: Replication references
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication references |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTimpD7CxQM0aNogW0fHXUiJqGJd2Wg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication references (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Replication references
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 23:45, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 20 June 2011 21:40, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> I know we've had some discussions around what to do with the Slony >>> support.. But it's there now, and IIRC the deal was we keep it. >> >> That was the deal. FWIW, I consider our Slony support to be less than >> useless, in that it is basically a GUI analogue to writing a long >> Slonik script full of apparently redundant entries. >> >>> I would, however, suggest that we rename it to actually be "slony >>> replication" rather than "replication". Or "Use slony" rather than >>> "Use replication". Calling it "replication" without qualifying it >>> causes confusion to many users (came across it with a client just >>> today, and it's not the first time). >>> >>> I realize we're fairly close to release - is this doable for 1.14, or >>> will that fsck things up for translators? >> >> +1 >> >> It isn't that hard to translate a few strings into all supported >> languages. If a translator isn't available to translate those few >> strings (and they'd have to not be answering any e-mail for that to be >> the case, and it will take them less than 5 minutes), that's likely to >> be in a language that isn't so widely spoken - it certainly won't be >> French or German. I'd be willing to live with a poor machine >> translation for a little while for those languages. If someone >> complains, the complaint is likely to be all we need to fix the >> problem ourselves. >> > > So, something like this. I went with calling the field inthe dialogs > "Use Slony" rather than "Use Slony replication", simply because the > second option is very long - much much longer than anything else > there, leading to a lot of wasted space. > > Comments? It should be "Slony Replication" for the menu and the collection factory name, not "Slony replication". Otherwise it seems OK. I would like to hear from Guillaume before breaking the translations though. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: