Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC
| От | Daniele Varrazzo |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | BANLkTimoE=KjRPSROUCJR2tvMetx4kkdmA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mar abr 26 12:58:19 -0300 2011: >> >> > Wow, I am so glad someone documented this. I often do factorial(4000) >> > which generates 12673 digits when teaching classes, and it bugged me >> > that we documented the limit as 1000 digits. >> >> I keep wondering why you want to know factorial(4000) so often. > > It is just to impress folks, and it is impressive. An instant > screenful of digits is pretty cool. If you are into impressing people with big numbers (or maybe doing something useful with them too) you may take a look at http://pgmp.projects.postgresql.org/ -- Daniele
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: