Re: Process wakeups when idle and power consumption
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Process wakeups when idle and power consumption |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTimneE7F=hXmrEFJatkSYuFiEyvSKw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Process wakeups when idle and power consumption (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Process wakeups when idle and power consumption
Re: Process wakeups when idle and power consumption |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10 May 2011 09:45, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > I think we need to refactor the function into something like: > > #define WL_LATCH_SET 1 > #define WL_SOCKET_READABLE 2 > #define WL_SOCKET_WRITEABLE 4 > #define WL_TIMEOUT 8 > #define WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH 16 While I agree with the need to not box ourselves into a corner on the latch interface by making sweeping assumptions, isn't the fact that a socket became readable or writable strictly an implementation detail? -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: